Cloud Consulting Services From a Team With No Reseller Margin at Stake
Most cloud advice arrives from somebody who earns a percentage of what you end up spending. Our cloud consulting services carry no such agreement with any platform, which is why an assessment here regularly recommends moving less than you expected to move.
Scope a Cloud Assessment
5.0
5.0
4.3
4.8The Question a Cloud Assessment Is Meant to Settle
Almost every estate arrives with the destination already chosen and the reasoning never written down. Reconstructing that reasoning is most of the value.
The useful question is not which platform is best. It is which of your workloads belong somewhere other than where they are, what that would cost to run rather than to move, and what happens to the ones that stay. Answer those three and the platform argument mostly resolves itself.
Our engineers look at what each system actually does, what it depends on, what it costs today, and what it would cost after. The output is a placement decision per workload with a number attached, not a target architecture diagram. A diagram is easy to produce and impossible to hold anybody to.
A bill that grew faster than the business. A renewal date on hardware nobody wants to replace. A customer questionnaire asking where data is held. A board that has decided on cloud without deciding on anything else. Aipxperts starts each of these the same way, by pricing the current estate properly, because most of them turn out to be a cost conversation wearing an architecture costume.
Once the placement decisions are made · If the question is broader than the platform
Whose Assessment You Would Be Reading
An assessment is only worth the delivery experience behind the person writing it. This is the firm that experience sits in.
100+
Software Engineers
500+
Solutions Delivered
30+
Industries Served
95%
Client Retention
120+
Clients Worldwide
3
Unicorn Products
Where Aipxperts Advises, and Where the Advice Stops
Each of these cloud consulting services ends in a written recommendation rather than in delivery. Where the recommendation is to proceed, the delivery is a separate engagement and is priced separately, which is the arrangement that keeps the advice honest.
Cloud Strategy and Advisory
Our consultants work out where cloud belongs in what you are trying to do commercially, over a horizon you can actually plan against. It is usually the shortest engagement and the one that prevents the most waste, and you leave with a written position on scope, sequence and the case for doing nothing yet.
Platform Selection and Workload Placement
Which workloads go where, assessed by our architects against your existing skills, your contracts and your data residency obligations rather than against a feature matrix. You get a placement decision per workload, with the run cost and the reason recorded against each.
Architecture Review and Landing Zone Design
The account structure, network boundaries, identity model and guardrails that everything after this will inherit. We design them once and properly, because getting this wrong is recoverable and expensive. You get a landing zone design your team can implement, and the list of decisions it locks in.
Cloud Cost Review and FinOps Design
Where the bill actually comes from is rarely where anybody assumes, so we trace it: tagging, allocation, rightsizing and commitment strategy, set up so cost stays attributable afterwards. You get the current bill broken down by owner, and the changes ranked by saving against effort.
Cloud Security Posture and Configuration Review
Public exposure, encryption, logging, network boundaries and the configurations that quietly drifted since somebody set them. Our architects rank the findings by exploitability and name the configuration change for each. Designing the identity and permission model itself is separate work, and it sits with cybersecurity consulting.
Second Opinion on a Proposal You Already Have
A plan from another supplier, read properly by consultants of ours with nothing to win from it, with the assumptions tested and the omissions named. You get what the proposal assumes, what it leaves out, and which questions to put back to the bidder. Cheap relative to the decision it informs.
The Advice We Gave and Whether It Was Taken
The detail worth reading on each is what the assessment advised against. A recommendation that endorses everything the client already intended is not an assessment.
SaaS
Building Our Own Timesheet Platform Across Web, Desktop and Mobile
Time tracking looks like a solved problem until the data has to mean something. Punchly is our own product, spanning web, desktop and mobile, tying hours to projects, expenses and client billing.
Read case study: Building Our Own Timesheet Platform Across Web, Desktop and MobileSaaS
A Browser Tool That Writes Image Metadata Across a Whole Batch at Once
Desktop tools edit EXIF one file at a time, which is fine for ten images and impossible for a thousand. Set GPS, keywords and author once, then download the whole tagged batch as a ZIP.
Read case study: A Browser Tool That Writes Image Metadata Across a Whole Batch at OnceFounders and Product Owners on the Assessment
The people who commissioned these cloud consulting services describe the engagement in their own words, on platforms that verify it before the review is published.
We have contracted a developer from Aipxperts now for several months, based on a referral. We have been very pleased with the quality of the work, the knowledge and skill level of our developer, and the value we're receiving for our fee. We also very much appreciate that the development team works at night (effectively), so we are sometimes able to turn client requests around in a day.There have been a couple of situations where we needed urgent help outside of our developer's normal business hours, and we've received that help (for which I am very grateful). While we have some challenges with communication sometimes, our overall satisfaction level is very high.
Our experience working with Aipxperts has been exceptionally satisfying. From start to finish, they handled the project with professionalism and responsibility. Communication was seamless, and they effectively addressed our requirements, delivering high-quality results on time. Their technical expertise was particularly impressive, as they effortlessly solved complex problems. We highly recommend Aipxperts for their outstanding service and dedication to client satisfaction.
What Your Sector Decides Before the Architecture Does
In most sectors an obligation or a contract constrains the placement decision before any technical argument gets a vote. Establishing those constraints first is what cloud consulting services are for.
Healthcare administration
We settle where records may be held and who may reach them with your compliance function before a region is chosen, because getting it right at landing zone stage costs nothing and getting it wrong means moving data twice. More on healthcare administration.
Fintech and financial services
Data residency and audit evidence a regulator will accept, plus the exit requirement almost every financial contract now carries. The exit path gets designed into the architecture by our architects, because that requirement shapes the architecture more than it shapes the paperwork. More on fintech and financial services.
Education and EdTech
Consumption concentrates into term time and collapses in between, which makes committed-spend discounts a trap rather than a saving. Our team models the commitment strategy against the actual term curve, which is genuinely different from anywhere else on this list. More on education and EdTech.
Logistics and warehousing
Systems that talk to carriers, sites and devices, some on connections nobody would design today. Those dependencies decide placement rather than preference in our assessments, because they will decide it eventually either way. More on logistics and warehousing.
Telecom
Volumes large enough that egress and inter-region transfer become the dominant line item, not compute. We model the data movement before the workload placement, because in this sector the movement is the cost. More on telecom.
Energy and utilities
Operational systems where a change has to be reversible and demonstrably so, alongside long procurement that makes any decision hard to revisit. Assessments we run take longer here and build the reversibility evidence as they go, which is appropriate rather than slow. More on energy and utilities.
Mobile games
Costs swing by an order of magnitude between a launch week and a quiet month, which makes reserved capacity the wrong instrument for most of the estate. How much of the base load is genuinely constant is what our architects establish before recommending any commitment. More on mobile games.
What You Can Hold Us To on a Cloud Engagement
Commitments Aipxperts makes on cloud consulting services, plus one limit worth knowing before you scope anything.
01No reseller agreement sits behind any recommendationWe hold no resale arrangement with AWS, Azure or Google Cloud, so nothing we advise changes what we earn. Ask every other bidder the same question and compare the answers, because it is the single most useful thing you can establish about cloud advice.
02Working depth across all three major platformsEnough experience on each to compare them honestly rather than defending the one we know. A supplier fluent in exactly one platform will find a reason it fits, and they will be sincere about it.
03Compliance is expressed as guardrails rather than as documentsAn obligation that lives only in a policy document is an obligation nobody is meeting. Where a rule can be enforced by a preventive control in the landing zone, that is where we put it.
04Cost is instrumented from the first design, not measured afterwardsTagging and allocation designed in at landing zone stage, so the bill stays attributable when it grows. Retrofitting attribution across an estate somebody already built is several times the work.
05Where the engagement stopsAt the recommendation and the design. Executing the migration and running the estate afterwards are separate engagements with separate teams, and we would rather quote them separately than bundle a decision with the work it might justify.
Situations Where You Do Not Need Cloud Consulting
Cloud consulting attracts enquiries that should not become engagements. Reading this may save you a fee, which is more useful than arguing the opposite.
A small estate with one clear ownerRoughly ten workloads and one engineer who understands all of them does not need an assessment. That person already holds the map an assessment would produce, and the money is better spent on the move itself.The decision is already made and the constraint is contractualIf a parent company has mandated a platform, or a customer contract names one, there is no placement decision left to make. Skip to the migration and let us argue about the landing zone instead.A single application, lifting and shifting, with no compliance scopeOne system, no regulated data, no interdependencies worth mapping. That is a migration task rather than a consulting engagement, and treating it as the latter adds weeks and no information.The real problem is the application rather than the platformWhere a system is slow, fragile or expensive because of how it was built, moving it changes the invoice and nothing else. This is the commonest misdiagnosis we see, and the honest recommendation is usually modernization rather than migration.And one situation where an assessment pays for itself immediatelyA bill that has grown faster than usage. That gap is almost always attribution rather than consumption, and it is measurable within days rather than weeks. When the application is the actual problem.
The Platforms and Tooling an Assessment Covers
What our architects assess and design against across the three major platforms, plus the cost, identity and guardrail tooling that sits around them. Nothing here implies a commercial relationship with any vendor named.
Discovery and dependency mapping
How the workload inventory gets built and how the service nobody documented gets found, without agents on every host where your policy forbids them.
AWS Application Discovery Service
Azure MigrateGoogle Cloud Migration Center
Prometheus
Grafana
Elasticsearch
Cost modelling and FinOps
Where the run-rate comparison is built and where tagging, showback and committed-use planning are set up before the first landing zone is deployed.
AWS Cost ExplorerAzure Cost ManagementGoogle Cloud BillingAmazon CloudWatchGrafana
Architecture and landing zone design
How the target account structure, network topology and identity boundaries are expressed, version-controlled and handed over as code you own.
TerraformAWS CloudFormation
PulumiAmazon Web ServicesMicrosoft Azure
Google Cloud
Git
Policy as code and guardrails
How compliance requirements become preventive controls, so a non-compliant resource fails at deployment instead of at audit.
Open Policy AgentHashiCorp SentinelAWS ConfigAzure PolicyTerraform
Container and platform strategy
Where the container decision is settled at design stage, because retrofitting an orchestration choice after the first cluster is expensive.
Kubernetes
Docker
Amazon EKSAzure Kubernetes ServiceGoogle Kubernetes Engine
Helm
The Review Worth Reading on Cloud Advice
The review to look for here is from a client who was advised to move less than they had budgeted for. Endorsement is easy to earn and worth nothing.
Standards the Design Is Built To, and What Is Not Held
An assessment reads your architecture, your bills and often your configuration. An NDA is signed before technical discovery begins, access is least-privilege and scoped to the engagement, credentials are named, time-bound and revoked at handover, and the findings, models and designs remain your property.
What the design is built toLeast privilege by default, encryption in transit and at rest, logging that survives the account it was generated in, and network boundaries that fail closed. Where your sector names a framework, the guardrails are mapped to it and the mapping is part of the deliverable.Access during the assessmentRead-only, to named accounts, for the duration and no longer. Where a configuration review needs deeper visibility, it is granted for a stated window and revoked by you rather than by us.Billing data, and why we ask for itCost analysis needs the actual bill rather than a summary. It stays in your account, we work against exports you control, and nothing is retained after the engagement closes.On badges, and the two we do not haveAipxperts holds neither ISO 27001 nor SOC 2, and holds no cloud vendor certification as an organisation. The individual experience is real and inspectable; the badges are not there. Procurement processes that require either should raise it on the first call.
How an Assessment Runs, and What Each Stage Lets You Decide
Each stage closes one decision, and the point of the sequence is that you could stop after any of them with something usable.
01Estate and dependency inventoryOur consultants catalogue every workload, what it depends on, who owns it and what it currently costs to run. It tells you whether the estate is smaller or larger than you believed, which is genuinely a coin toss.02Current cost, properly attributedWe break the bill down by workload and owner rather than by service line, which is how cloud invoices arrive and why nobody reads them. By the end you know whether you have a cost problem, an attribution problem, or neither.03Obligation and constraint mappingResidency, retention, audit and contractual exit requirements, gathered by our team from your compliance function rather than assumed. This is where options that were never actually available get ruled out, usually before anybody wastes time comparing them.04Placement decision per workloadMove, stay, retire or rebuild, with our architects recording the run cost and the reasoning against each entry. That gives you the scope of any migration and its business case in the same document.05Landing zone and guardrail designAccount structure, identity boundaries, network design and the preventive controls we design to enforce the obligations established earlier. You find out here whether your own team can implement it, or whether that is a further engagement.06Cost model and commitment strategyWhat the estate should cost once settled, and which commitments our team judges safe to make against a demand curve you can evidence. It separates the saving that is real from the saving that depends on behaviour changing.07Recommendation, sequence and the case againstOur written position, the order of work, and an honest statement of what would make this a bad idea. Not proceeding remains a legitimate answer at this stage.
Practical Questions Before Scoping an Assessment
One answer is about money and another talks you out of the engagement, and both get asked more than anything in between.
Share your project vision
Tell us what you want to build. A specialist, not a salesperson, replies.
Get the Bill Read Before You Commission Anything
Send last month’s cloud bill and the list of what is running. Those two things settle more than a workshop does: back comes where the cost is genuinely concentrated, which workloads look misplaced, and whether an assessment is worth commissioning at all.
Send Us the BillPublished From Cloud Assessments
Our engineers and consultants write up what they learn on live projects: architecture decisions, model evaluation results, and the trade-offs behind them. Written for the people who will implement them.
-
DevOps Best Practices for Software Development and Deployment
IntroductionIn today’s software landscape, speed and efficiency are king. DevOps is a philosophy that aims to bridge the gap between
