Cybersecurity Services That Protect Revenue, Data and Uptime

Aipxperts finds the gaps an attacker would use, closes them in priority order alongside your engineers, and hands over the detection rules, runbooks and evidence trail your team keeps. Our cybersecurity services sit inside a software company, so the person explaining the risk has shipped in the language it lives in.

Book a Security Review

Clutch 5.0GoodFirms 5.0Google 4.3Upwork 4.8

The Work Inside Our Cybersecurity Services

We secure the systems your business actually runs on: cloud workloads, customer-facing applications, identity infrastructure and the AI models now moving into production alongside them.

Our engineers read your codebase and your architecture before recommending a control, so the fix suits your stack rather than a template. That is the practical advantage of a security practice that sits inside a delivery organisation instead of beside one.

What you receive is a prioritised remediation plan tied to business impact, hands-on implementation from the same people who wrote the assessment, and a handover pack your team owns afterwards: detection rules, runbooks, retest results and mapped control evidence.

One boundary, stated here rather than buried: we build and tune the monitoring. Your team or your provider operates it.

Some arrive after an incident, with the attack still running. Some arrive because an enterprise customer sent a security questionnaire they cannot answer. Others are about to put an AI feature in front of customers and want to know what it opens up. Aipxperts works with all three, and the first conversation is different in each case.

The Software Company Around That Practice

Company-wide, not the security practice alone. The security team is deliberately small; the organisation around it is not.

100+

Software Engineers

500+

Solutions Delivered

30+

Industries Served

95%

Client Retention

120+

Clients Worldwide

3

Unicorn Products

Where a Security Engagement Starts, and What Triggered It

Some clients arrive mid-build, some with an incident behind them, some because a customer asked a question they could not answer. Every one of these cybersecurity services runs as a single engagement, a phased roadmap or a retainer. Where what you need is an assessment and a roadmap rather than hands on the systems, that is cybersecurity consulting and it is a separate engagement with a separate team.

Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing

Our testers attack your web applications, APIs, internal networks and mobile builds the way an intruder would. You get reproducible exploitation steps and specific fix guidance filed where your developers already work, then a retest that confirms each finding is genuinely closed.

Cloud Security Posture and Hardening

A posture review across your AWS, Azure and Google Cloud accounts, run by our cloud engineers, tightening over-permissive IAM roles and enforcing encryption and logging everywhere. You get hardened baselines and a written record of what changed, so one misconfiguration stops being a data exposure.

Detection Engineering and SIEM Onboarding

We build custom detection rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK inside your Microsoft Sentinel or Splunk deployment, tune the log sources feeding them, and write automated containment playbooks. We engineer them. Your team or your managed provider operates them.

Application Security Inside Your Pipeline

Threat models at design, static and dynamic analysis gates inside your CI/CD, and manual secure code review, put into your SDLC permanently by our application security engineers. Releases keep shipping on schedule without OWASP Top 10 flaws travelling with them.

Identity and Access Management

An access review run by our engineers that clears orphaned and over-privileged accounts across Okta, Microsoft Entra ID or SailPoint, after which you keep least-privilege role models, enforced MFA and admin credentials vaulted. One phished password stays contained instead of becoming an incident.

AI and Machine Learning Security

Our AI and security engineers work the same engagement, which is unusual. They test your models for prompt injection, training data poisoning, model extraction and unsafe output handling, and secure the data pipelines behind them, so the AI features on your roadmap stop being the easiest way in.

Security Awareness and Phishing Simulation

Phishing simulations and role-specific training for developers, finance and executive teams, with click and reporting rates we report back by department. The people most likely to be targeted get attention before the next payment fraud attempt, not after it.

Red Team and Adversary Simulation

A controlled threat-actor simulation against your people and your network using MITRE ATT&CK techniques, followed by purple team sessions where our testers sit with your defenders. Detection and escalation gaps surface while a real breach is still hypothetical. The pipeline and release engineering behind all of this is DevOps work, and the AI systems our engineers build are AI development.

The Exposure, the Fix, and the Evidence Left Behind

What the client could prove afterwards, rather than what was found. Findings are easy to produce; evidence that a weakness is closed is the deliverable.

Environments We Tested, and What Held Afterwards

The engineering and platform leaders whose environments we tested and hardened describe the work in their own words.

Reviewed on Clutch
Hardik was very helpful in advice and completing the work.
TomAustralia
Reviewed on GoodFirms
We have contracted a developer from Aipxperts now for several months, based on a referral. We have been very pleased with the quality of the work, the knowledge and skill level of our developer, and the value we're receiving for our fee. We also very much appreciate that the development team works at night (effectively), so we are sometimes able to turn client requests around in a day.There have been a couple of situations where we needed urgent help outside of our developer's normal business hours, and we've received that help (for which I am very grateful). While we have some challenges with communication sometimes, our overall satisfaction level is very high.
Jason LancasterPresident, Spork Marketing

How the Threat Picture Shifts by Sector

A marketplace and a logistics operator face different attackers, different regulators and different definitions of downtime. Each sector here carries a constraint that decides the control design before anybody opens a scanner.

Fintech and financial services

Partner banks and payment processors set the control bar before your product requirements do. Onboarding data and third-party API integrations get secured by us on fintech products, with the evidence a PCI DSS review will ask for assembled while the architecture is still changeable.

Healthcare platforms

Patient data moves across integrations, devices and reporting, and every hop needs its own audit trail. Our engineers design access control and logging into each hop on healthcare platforms, scoping around the systems clinicians use rather than the ones that are easy to test.

eCommerce

Checkout and admin paths attract card skimming scripts and bot fraud together, and peak season is when both arrive. Those paths and the customer accounts behind them get defended by us before the trading period rather than during it, which is the only sequencing that helps an eCommerce business.

Telecom

Partner interconnects and network management systems are reachable from more places than subscriber data is. Our engineers secure both on telecom estates, and build detection for the infrastructure-level abuse that generic rule packs miss entirely.

Energy and utilities

Remote sites and field telemetry run older protocols that resist modern segmentation. Separation that survives those constraints is what we design on energy estates, closing the remote access paths attackers reach for first.

Manufacturing

A ransomware event in the back office can stop a line for a week. We separate corporate IT from production networks on manufacturing sites and secure the supplier connections into your ERP, because that is the route most incidents actually take.

Retail

One compromised branch reaches head office through the same links that carry stock data. We secure point of sale estates, store networks and supplier portals across every retail location rather than only the flagship.

What Separates Security Suppliers in Year Two

Plenty of vendors will run a scanner and send you the export. The difference shows up next: who writes the detection rules, who implements the fix, and whether the person explaining the risk understands the application it lives in.

01A small security practice inside a software companyOur security team is deliberately small and sits within a hundred-plus engineering organisation. Source code, CI/CD configuration and cloud architecture get reviewed by people who ship software, and developers receive findings in their own repositories with fix examples in their own language.

02Detection engineering, not tool deploymentWe write and tune detection rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK inside your SIEM, then measure them against simulated attacks. Out-of-the-box rule packs generate noise and miss technique variants, and a team that does not trust its alert queue stops reading it.

03We work with your tooling and resell none of itMicrosoft Sentinel, Splunk, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Wiz, Okta and Tenable are all tools we work across without a reseller relationship behind any of them. Licences already on your balance sheet get extended first, and when we do recommend a replacement the reasoning is technical rather than commercial.

04Security for AI systems as well as the network around themWe assess model pipelines, retrieval systems and LLM applications for prompt injection, data leakage and unsafe tool execution, and align controls with EU AI Act transparency expectations.

05Evidence that survives an auditEvery engagement produces mapped control evidence, retest results and a remediation trail your auditor, insurer or enterprise customer can review. We align to NIST CSF, ISO 27001 and Zero Trust reference architecture, so one body of work serves defence and compliance together.

The Security Tooling Your Engagement Will Run On

We extend what you already own before proposing anything new. These are the platforms our engineers deploy, integrate and tune across detection, testing, identity and compliance work, grouped by the layer each one defends.

SIEM and detection

Where log sources are correlated and custom detection rules mapped to MITRE ATT&CK are written and tuned against your environment.

microsoftMicrosoft SentinelsplunkSplunkibmIBM QRadarelasticElastic SecurityLogRhythm

Endpoint and extended detection

Runtime protection and investigation on the endpoints attackers actually land on, with containment available from the console.

CrowdStrikeSentinelOnepaloaltonetworksPalo Alto Cortex XDRmicrosoftMicrosoft Defender for EndpointvmwareVMware Carbon Black

Cloud and container security

Misconfiguration, over-permissive roles and unscanned images get found across accounts before an attacker finds them first.

WizpaloaltonetworksPrisma CloudOrca SecuritymicrosoftMicrosoft Defender for CloudamazonwebservicesAmazon GuardDutyfalcoFalco

Vulnerability management and testing

Continuous discovery of known weaknesses across estate and applications, ranked so remediation work follows business exposure.

TenablequalysQualysRapid7burpsuiteBurp SuitemetasploitMetasploitNmapMITRE ATT&CK

Identity and privileged access

Least-privilege roles are enforced here, joiner-mover-leaver flows are automated, and privileged sessions are recorded.

oktaOktaMicrosoft Entra IDSailPointCyberArkauth0Auth0keycloakKeycloak

Application and pipeline security

Static analysis, runtime testing and dependency scanning wired into the pipeline so findings reach developers inside the workflow they already use.

sonarqubeSonarQubesnykSnyktrivyTrivyCheckovgithubGitHub Advanced Security

Secrets, encryption and data protection

Credentials leave source control, rotation becomes automatic, and keys end up somewhere with an access log attached.

vaultHashiCorp VaultamazonwebservicesAWS KMSmicrosoftazureAzure Key VaultamazonwebservicesAWS Secrets Manager

Frameworks and evidence

Control evidence collected once and mapped across every framework your customers, auditors and regulators ask about. No GRC platform is named here because we operate none; the mapping is the work.

NIST CSFCIS ControlsPCI DSSGDPRHIPAAZero Trust

How a Cybersecurity Engagement Runs, Stage by Stage

Security engagements go wrong when testing starts before anybody agrees what matters. Each stage of our cybersecurity services has a defined exit condition, so at any point you know what has been proven and what is still open.

01Asset discovery and attack surface mappingOur testers close this only when every external domain, exposed service, cloud account, SaaS integration and shadow IT system has a confirmed owner. Most clients find something here still reachable from the internet that they believed had been retired.02Threat modelling and risk scoringWe exit when each plausible attacker path against your architecture carries a business impact and likelihood score mapped to MITRE ATT&CK. Remediation order then reflects damage potential rather than CVSS arithmetic.03Control gap assessmentOur engineers check every control three ways before this completes: documented, implemented, and demonstrably working under test. Controls that exist on paper but fail in practice get flagged separately, because that gap is where breaches live.04Remediation and hardeningEach sprint closes on change we have validated: identity cleanup and MFA rollout, network segmentation, cloud policy correction, secrets management. Nothing is marked done on the strength of a configuration diff alone.05Offensive validation and retestA finding is resolved only once we have attacked it again and failed. Every closed item is retested through penetration testing or a red team exercise before its status changes.06Detection engineering and containment playbooksExits when each priority threat scenario has a tuned rule and an automated containment playbook. Because we are not watching your environment overnight, those playbooks are built to contain without us.07Handover, retest and periodic reviewWe finish when your team holds the detection rules, runbooks and evidence trail, with a retest and posture review scheduled. Day-to-day operation after that sits with your team or your provider.

Profiles We Cannot Edit

Independently moderated profiles carry our ratings: Clutch, GoodFirms, Upwork and Google. Read them directly. Aipxperts has been building software since 2012.

Upwork4.8150 reviewsClutch5.012 reviewsGoogle4.335 reviewsGoodFirms5.05 reviews

The Certifications This Practice Holds, and the Ones It Does Not

Before you hand a vendor privileged access to your environment you should be able to check its record, and know what it does not hold. Both are here, including the certification question security teams ask first. Naming a framework says very little on its own, so what follows is what each one changes about how the work is actually run, including where we do not hold the credential a client might assume.

On certification, plainlyWe map client environments to ISO 27001 and NIST CSF and prepare the evidence auditors ask for, but Aipxperts is not itself ISO 27001 certified. If your procurement process requires a certified supplier, that is worth establishing on the first call rather than the fifth.How engagements are governedA mutual NDA is signed before any architecture discussion, credential handover or code access, alongside a rules of engagement document defining scope boundaries, testing windows, escalation contacts and data handling. Findings, reports and evidence remain your property. We deliver under GDPR and HIPAA obligations and extend the same discipline to AI governance where clients run models in production.

Questions About Us, and About the Alternatives

Cost, timelines, who holds your data, how we compare with a managed provider, and what happens once the engagement finishes. Answered as we would answer them on a call.

Share your project vision

Tell us what you want to build. A specialist, not a salesperson, replies.

PDF, DOC or image, up to 10MB. Optional.
My idea is confidential – happy to sign an NDA.

The number moves on how many applications and cloud accounts enter scope, whether testing is one-off or scheduled, whether implementation runs alongside assessment, and how much compliance evidence work is included. We scope in a discovery call and give a fixed-price proposal before any work starts. Longer programmes run as a dedicated team or on time and materials where the scope is still moving.

Scoping and rules of engagement usually take a few days. Active testing runs across an agreed window sized to application complexity and environment scale, and reporting follows once findings are validated and rated. Retesting is scheduled after your remediation window, so closed findings are confirmed by us before you report them as closed.

Directly: we are a security engineering team and an MSSP is a monitoring operation. If what you need is an overnight eyes-on-glass desk, an MSSP is the right choice and we will tell you so. If what you need is somebody to find the gaps, fix them with your developers, and build the detection your MSSP then runs, that is our work. The two combine well.

Yes. A mutual NDA is signed before any architecture discussion, credential handover or code access. Engagements also run under a rules of engagement document defining scope boundaries, testing windows, escalation contacts and data handling. Findings, reports and evidence remain your property and are shared only through channels you approve.

Yes, and in most engagements we extend and tune what you own before proposing anything new. We work across Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk, IBM QRadar, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Palo Alto Cortex XDR, Wiz, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk, Tenable, Qualys and Rapid7. We resell none of them.

Not as a service level, and we will not claim otherwise. Support runs during working hours with a documented escalation path and named contacts, and response targets are agreed per engagement rather than published as a blanket number. Where continuous cover is genuinely required we build and tune the detection and containment automation, and your team or an MSSP operates it.

No. We map client environments to ISO 27001 and NIST CSF, prepare control evidence auditors accept, and run governance programmes toward certification, but we do not hold the certification ourselves. If your procurement requires a certified supplier, raise it on the first call and we will tell you plainly whether we fit.

Yes. Our governance work covers control mapping, gap analysis, policy drafting and evidence collection for GDPR, HIPAA and ISO 27001 programmes, plus EU AI Act readiness for clients deploying machine learning. We prepare the technical evidence auditors ask for, so the audit becomes a review rather than a discovery exercise.

We test models and AI applications for prompt injection, training data poisoning, model extraction, insecure output handling and excessive agent permissions, then secure the data pipelines and retrieval layers behind them. We also document model transparency and validation evidence where AI governance obligations apply to your deployment.

As an extension of it. Your team typically keeps ownership of infrastructure and change control while we handle offensive testing, detection engineering and incident depth. Every change is documented, purple team sessions run jointly, and your staff are trained to maintain what we build before we step back.

Scope Your Cybersecurity Engagement in One Conversation

Tell us what worries you most: an audit date you cannot move, a cloud environment nobody has reviewed in two years, an enterprise questionnaire sitting unanswered, or an AI feature about to go live. We will scope it and say honestly what needs attention first, and what can wait.

Send Us the Questionnaire

Field Notes on Attack and Defence

Our engineers and consultants write up what they learn on live projects: architecture decisions, model evaluation results, and the trade-offs behind them. Written for the people who will implement them.